POA&Ms are limited.
Level 1 doesn't allow them. At Levels 2 and 3, only certain requirements can be on a POA&M at assessment time, and those items must be closed within 180 days to keep conditional status.
Compliance & CMMC Readiness
JUEM GLOBAL helps defense contractors, cloud providers, and agencies meet CMMC, NIST, FedRAMP, and RMF requirements with hands-on engineering, accurate documentation, and evidence that holds up.
Why This Matters
Federal contracts increasingly require contractors to show how they protect government information. For Department of Defense work, CMMC ties contract eligibility to a verified level of cybersecurity. For cloud services sold to agencies, FedRAMP sets the bar. For federal systems, the Risk Management Framework governs authorization to operate. Each one requires the same thing: controls that are actually implemented, plus the documentation and evidence to prove it.
Understanding CMMC 2.0
CMMC 2.0 has three levels. The level in a contract depends on the type of information you will handle.
| Level | Protects | Requirements | Assessment |
|---|---|---|---|
| Level 1 | Federal Contract Information (FCI) | 15 basic safeguarding requirements from FAR 52.204-21 | Annual self-assessment and affirmation, entered in SPRS |
| Level 2 | Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) | 110 requirements from NIST SP 800-171 Rev. 2 | Self-assessment or a C3PAO assessment every three years, as the contract specifies, plus annual affirmation |
| Level 3 | CUI for the highest-priority programs | Level 2 plus 24 selected requirements from NIST SP 800-172 | Government-led assessment (DCMA DIBCAC) every three years, after Level 2 certification by a C3PAO |
Level 1 doesn't allow them. At Levels 2 and 3, only certain requirements can be on a POA&M at assessment time, and those items must be closed within 180 days to keep conditional status.
Clearly defining where FCI and CUI live, and keeping that boundary tight, is one of the most effective ways to reduce compliance effort.
DoD has adjusted the CMMC rollout timeline. We follow current guidance so your plan stays aligned with what solicitations actually require.
How We Help
Scoping, asset categorization, and a readiness assessment against Level 1 or Level 2 requirements. We prepare you for a self-assessment or a third-party assessment, including your SPRS score.
A requirement-by-requirement review of your current state, with findings ranked by risk and assessment impact. Then a practical remediation roadmap.
We write or update System Security Plans that describe what is actually deployed. We also build POA&Ms with clear owners, milestones, and closure evidence.
We implement the fixes in AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud environments: identity and MFA, encryption, logging, configuration baselines, vulnerability management, and boundary protection, defined in code where possible.
For cloud service providers, we support boundary definition, control implementation at the Low, Moderate, or High baseline, documentation, and preparation for 3PAO assessment.
Support across all seven NIST SP 800-37 steps: Prepare, Categorize, Select, Implement, Assess, Authorize, and Monitor. This includes ATO package preparation.
Ongoing control monitoring aligned with NIST SP 800-137: automated configuration checks, vulnerability scanning, log review, POA&M upkeep, and evidence collection, so you stay ready between assessments.
Our Approach
01
Identify the contract requirement, data types (FCI, CUI), and system boundary.
02
Measure your current state against the applicable framework.
03
Close gaps, highest impact first, using repeatable infrastructure-as-code.
04
Align the SSP, policies, and POA&M with what is actually in place.
05
Monitor continuously and keep evidence current.
Frameworks We Work With
Why JUEM GLOBAL
Start a Conversation
Start with a scoped readiness review. We'll help you understand the requirement, your current gaps, and a realistic plan to close them.
Call (832) 956-6632 or use the contact form.